Skip to content

OSDOCS-13951: collapse managing compute dir #91474

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat commented Apr 1, 2025

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 1, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 1, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 1, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Apr 1, 2025

🤖 Wed Apr 02 17:42:43 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://91474--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat force-pushed the OSDOCS-13951-collapse-managing-compute-dir branch from deecfb2 to 6cf43c4 Compare April 2, 2025 14:13
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

https://91474--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-infrastructure-machinesets.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

https://91474--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-infrastructure-machinesets.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat force-pushed the OSDOCS-13951-collapse-managing-compute-dir branch from 6cf43c4 to bdc7334 Compare April 2, 2025 17:31
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.


To add or remove an instance of a machine in a compute machine set, you can manually scale the compute machine set.

This guidance is relevant to fully automated, installer-provisioned infrastructure installations. Customized, user-provisioned infrastructure installations do not have compute machine sets.
ifeval::["{context}" != "mapi-compute-managing-machines"]
include::snippets/machine-user-provisioned-limitations.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replaces this one-off line with the warning we have that talks about this issue. Excluded it from the mapi-compute-managing-machines page because it already appears at the top of that page.

Comment on lines +22 to +23
* If have you enabled the cluster-wide proxy, you must add any compute machines that are not included in the `networking.machineNetwork[].cidr` field in the installation configuration file to the `noProxy` field in the `Proxy` object before scaling them up to prevent connection issues.
For more information, see "Enabling the cluster-wide proxy".
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat Apr 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This used to be outside the normal Prerequisites section, moved it in with the other two

@sunzhaohua2
Copy link

LGTM

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 15, 2025
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 15, 2025
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 15, 2025

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 15, 2025
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 15, 2025

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 15, 2025

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13951 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
N/A (release branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-13951

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit b586046 into openshift:ocp-docs-cluster_infra_reorg Apr 15, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants